Case Files
Real scam attempts we've detected and documented to help protect other buyers.
1972 Buick Skylark Convertible
Seller posed as a licensed dealer with fabricated documentation including a business license, title copy, and Carfax report. Buyer verified the business name with local BBB before purchasing, but the online operation was an impersonator. Buyer wired $14,500 to an account registered to a shell company with a different name. Delivery was repeatedly delayed with escalating excuses, then seller went silent and blocked all contact. Victim is a 69-year-old retired disabled person.
2018 Winnebago View 24J RV
Seller presented fabricated state business license from New Mexico Taxation Division and Certificate of Good Standing from NM Secretary of State. After full payment by wire transfer, seller claimed the delivery truck was in an accident destroying the RV, then requested banking information to issue a refund — a secondary fraud attempt. When victim refused and demanded a paper check, all contact ceased.
Undisclosed vehicle
Buyer researched the dealership before purchasing and found no initial red flags. Vehicle was paid for in full with delivery promised. Seller missed the delivery window, then stopped responding to all calls, texts, and messages entirely. Subsequent investigation revealed the operation had defrauded multiple buyers.
RV (undisclosed model)
Website advertised RVs at significantly below-market prices. Buyer requested in-person inspection and seller refused, stating it was not possible. Full payment was required by wire transfer before delivery. A family member called separately and was given identical instructions for the same vehicle, confirming the operation was running a script. No vehicle was ever delivered.
Truck (undisclosed model)
Buyer communicated with the same salesperson repeatedly over several days — a tactic that builds false trust before a payment request. Wire transfer of $46,039 was completed through a personal banker at a legitimate bank. Buyer recognized the fraud immediately after the wire cleared, but the bank could not reverse it. This case demonstrates that bank involvement in processing does not validate a transaction, and that extended communication before payment is itself a manipulation tactic.